“Rabbit’s Foot = Admission of Fear”

“Rabbit’s Foot = Admission of Fear”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Do you carry a rabbit’s foot or a crystal in your pocket? Do you sage yourself before you go out? Do you tell your clients to surround themselves with a “bubble of white light” to protect themselves?

Aren’t all of those simply an admission of fear? Fear that one may be attacked by somebody who may harm us? Or that something bad might befall us?

I know these are popular talisman myths today. But the history of the rabbit’s foot in this way goes back to at least the 1500’s, and in the early 1800’s it was believed that witches would take the form of a rabbit so their foot would have magical powers. Really?

Even if you believe in such stories, the use of any of the above indicates a fear that needs external protection from.

There is a fundamental principle I have observed for thousands of years: “Fear attracts the object of fear.” That means either we internally create and manifest our own fears externally in our lives, or we attract others into our lives by expressing our fears in our thoughts and behavior that “bullies” then are attracted to since — to them — we are vulnerable and easy targets.

So, what is the most effective way to protect ourselves from external bullies?

By strengthening ourselves from within.

Bullies hate internally confident people. They stay away from those with a strong sense of self esteem. Such strong people are a pain in the neck to bullies. Way too difficult to dominate. And bullies are all about easy domination.

So, to really protect ourselves from all bullying types, whether on this side or the Other Side, I suggest instead of carrying a crystal, enveloping oneself with sage, or stroking the rabbit’s foot in one’s pocket, that we “turn within” and strengthen that unshakeable connection with ourselves. By doing so, we shed our fears, instead of continuing to carry them around trying to mask them with crystals, sage or a rabbit’s foot. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 50 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Politics or Cruelty?”

“Politics or Cruelty?”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

I have my own political leanings and choices. I keep them to myself. I have found that reasonable, intelligent people can disagree on political issues. 

However, I draw a clear line between disagreements on political issues and how a politician expresses their views and themselves to the public. 

I have no tolerance for political leaders who publicly bully or otherwise act cruelly towards others. 

It doesn’t matter if I even agree with the politician’s views on the issues in discussion. If that politician, regardless of their political party, consistently acts like a bully, they have lost my respect and perhaps my vote. 

I expect my leaders to lead. That includes behaving like a leader. 

“Leaders” are self assured, inwardly secure human beings. “Posers” are often brash, pushy and insecure. Leaders are good listeners and welcome others’ ideas. Posers might make you believe they are listening, only to act on their own selfish thoughts. 

I suggest that our society and our world 🌎 might benefit from voting based on that distinction. Electing more of the former. 

Why is this important?

Because when a crisis happens, which one do you want at the helm?

Of course, ideally you would want someone who both agrees with your political views and your leadership ideals. But what if that’s not what happened in the election? What if your candidate lost? 

Wouldn’t it benefit us all — regardless of our political views — to educate our entire electorate, starting with our children who will eventually mature to be voters, to elect politicians (on both sides of the aisle) who are “leaders”? Not narcissistic bullies. Not “posers.”

In a crisis requiring complex decision making, I would argue that even the politician who disagrees with my political views yet has a strong inner presence based on self-confidence and self-knowledge would be better able to make socially conscious decisions than the politician who is inherently caught up in himself and who defaults to bullying others as his practice. 

The latter — because of his personality type — is unable to get out of his own way. This can be fatal in a crisis. Maybe not to him, but to those around him. Even the world 🌎 at large. 

To me, insecurity — and its frequent partner, cruelty — is a losing behavioral choice. Politicians who embody those fundamental flaws will not get my vote. 

And they will not bring about freedom in the world, no matter how much they may profess and promise this to us, because the shackles of their insecurity within — inherently and subconsciously — will dictate inevitably that their external behavior be to shackle others. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 50 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“There are no coincidences”

[The following was a life changing epiphany for me many decades ago:
If there is one exception to a phrase, statement or rule about life that has been spoken about as being “universal,” then that rule is incorrect. Because a universal rule cannot be universal if it has even one exception to it.]

“Everything happens for a reason” 
“There are no coincidences” 
“It was meant to be” 
“It was our destiny”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Why is it important to stop saying these phrases?

Because they are “absolute” statements. That means they must apply in every situation in life.

No exceptions.

But do they?

Our life experience tells us they do not apply in every situation that happens. 

So they must be incorrect. 

One exception reduces the “absolutely all the time” rule to a mistake. 

Why is this important to understand?

Because if we truly believe those incorrect rules, then we must also believe that Free Will does not exist. Those rules mean that we have no choices in life. 

If “everything was meant to happen,” then everything is already known — all of your choices, and all of the trillions of other minds’ choices, and all of the effects of those trillions of trillions of choices, etc. Those phrases or rules all mean that everything has been predetermined.
Already set and decided. 

So if that’s the case, then why bother to live life?
Pretty dismal, if you ask me.

Also, a terrible unintended consequence of these false beliefs is that we might consciously or subconsciously — incorrectly — think we deserved to be abused when someone else mistreats us. 

No. Absolutely not.

The abuser is responsible for his choices. Not you. That abuse was not somehow “preordained” to absolutely happen. He (or she) chose to act inappropriately towards us.

I understand that people often say those things without meaning they’re absolutely true all the time. But English words (or any other language) have meaning. And those words mean “absolutely all the time without exception.”

They may make us feel good and comforted temporarily when we are feeling “down” or insecure, but are they accurate and helpful for our mental health in the longer run?

I think not. 

I prefer describing reality the way it is. Not the way we might imagine it to be in one special situation, and then magically change it in another situation, when it doesn’t fit. 

I think inner contentment and peace within comes from understanding and accepting reality clearly and with conviction. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 50 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Idealistic Realism”

“Idealistic Realism”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

I’m an “idealistic realist.” That means I have ideals that I aspire to, but I’m realistic about getting there. 

Most of us have ideals. Desires and goals. But we don’t match our desires with realistic expectations for achieving those goals. 

For example, take the desire for less anxiety and the goal of balance in life, free from the overwhelming grip and pain of anxiety and stress in our lives. 

It’s an achievable goal. I’ve helped many people get there in their lives. 

But how long does it take?

Of course that’s the million dollar question. And the honest answer is “it depends.”  It depends on each person and how much stress they come with, the choices they make, and how patient they are with themselves in achieving a state of more balance in their lives. 

The first element is already set. The second and third elements they have control over. 

As their teacher I can only guide them. I don’t control those choices. They do. 

But I suggest we all need to look realistically at the goal of achieving balance in life. And take the gradual improvements in our lives through meditation and other balancing choices as “successes” along the way. 

Unfortunately, the “American” cultural view of “immediate gratification” has spread worldwide over the past 20-30 years. It comes along with the “consume now” economic driver that fuels so many country’s economies today. The more people buy every day, the higher the GDP of the country. And the best way to get people to buy more is to advertise and teach them that having patience is unacceptable. That to be happy we “need more now.”

I suggest that is not healthy. And that impatience breeds more stress and ensures an anxious life. 

A friend once told me that “most people have the patience of a flea.”

With the goal of restoring balance in our lives, we need patience.  We need to remember that we’ve been collecting and storing our “baggage” for years…and likely decades. At least. 

So if you’re 20-30 years old, what if it took 3-5 years of daily twice a day meditating for you to restore balance in your life? Or if you were 40-50 years old, what if it took you 5-10 years to restore a more or less “full” state of balance — meaning you’d likely not be overwhelmed by life experiences anymore? What if it gradually improved over that period of time, but it took that long to more fully establish that more unshakable sense of being?

Would you make that commitment to have that more “unshakable you” for the rest of your life?

Or would you give up after a week or two, or a month or two if your anxiety — that you had been collecting for decades — had not completely dissipated?

I’m here to help people wherever they are on the spectrum of anxiety — from very little (few people) to a lot (most people). 

But as I said, I’m an idealistic realist. I know that not everyone has the patience to match their desire for a balanced life with the choices they make and the time it takes to achieve that goal. 

Yet the idealist in me welcomes everyone to start that journey and see if they may surprise even themselves in how much patience they may develop along the way as they see gradual improvements in their well-being. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 50 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“The Mesmerized Western Seeker”

“The Mesmerized Western Seeker”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

So many in the West are seemingly swept away by the mere mention of an idea or a guru from the East. 

Why is that?

I think it may be because the terminology is so foreign to the Western ear that it somehow garners an almost immediate credibility without further discernment into the underlying idea itself. 

In addition, I’ve witnessed a similar phenomenon over the past 50 years with the names of the people pontificating those ideas. 

Again, for some reason it appears that spiritual teachers whose names start with “Shri” or even “Shri Shri,” or that sound like or actually are Indian, Southeast Asian, or to a lesser degree East Asian attract Western seekers in droves. Even teachers whose birth names were Christian or Jewish, but who changed them to an Indian sounding one seem to have catapulted their reputations by that simple name-changing act. 

But is what they have been teaching really that different from what the Westerners — steeped more in the Judeo-Christian traditions — have been used to hearing?

I think not so much. 

Without getting into the weeds of each of the traditions, and just looking at them from 100,000 feet, I think they all share some common denominators. 

The use of fear to motivate. The use of a lofty goal to attract people’s minds. The use of rewards to guide and control. The concept that there is something larger than the individual to be either worshipped as an individual being (God) or an inanimate state to attain (Enlightenment). 

The languaging of those concepts may vary but I think the similarity and parallelism cuts across both the Eastern and the Western traditions. 

What’s the teaching point here?

To look beyond the nomenclature, beneath the outer verbiage, past the titles couched in what may sound to the Western ear as inherently “mystical.”

What are they really saying? Does it make sense?

Does it give new insights? Or is it just rehashing of old ideas dressed up in Asian garb or Americanized lingo?

Sometimes it seems like almost any mystical-sounding idea is mesmerizing enough to inspire yet another few thousand Western seekers to sell all their worldly possessions and blindly follow — prostrating at the feet of someone spouting gibberish cloaked in a foreign language. 

Ask questions. Use your discernment. Hone your ability to distinguish between ideas that sound similar but are different. 

And then make up your own mind. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 50 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Barriers to Recalling Past Life Memories”

“Barriers to Recalling Past Life Memories”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

The more you believe in a state of Perfection, the more you hold yourself to that standard. 

The more you hold yourself to that standard, the more you block yourself from continual personal growth. (Because once you have reached the state of “perfection,” there can no longer be any more growth.)

The more you block yourself from continual personal growth, the more limited your journey will become. Instead of continued growth and expansion, you will have chosen increasing limitation and living in the illusion of perfection. 

How does that affect past life memory recall?

The more you hold yourself to a standard of Perfection, the more you decrease your chances of remembering your past lives. Because they will most likely remind you of how imperfect you have been, and therefore may cause you embarrassment and shame. Which you will emotionally want to avoid. And therefore, subconsciously block. 

Why? To preserve your belief that you can be — and maybe you even think you are — perfect. 

The more you accept your imperfections, the more you accept (love) yourself. The more you accept yourself, the broader that “time of acceptance” can become. Perhaps even to include your past lives. From which you can learn more about who you are now. 

[Note: In this essay, I use the standard definition of “perfection”: “free from all flaws and defects.” That means no mistakes. Ever. Forever. So, I’m not using the New Age colloquial meaning that “we’re all perfect the way we are!”]


If you are curious about Kelvin’s journey resurfacing his two dozen past lives
that reach back 6,000 years,
you might be interested in his 2023 book:
“After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives”
which is available on Amazon.

 

Click on this image for more about this book.

 

Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 50 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Rational Thought and Intuitive Feeling”

“Rational Thought and Intuitive Feeling”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Get rid of the idea that one is better than the other in decision making. 

Let’s agree that too much reliance on either one is what we could call “imbalanced.” That both are important. And that both actually are automatically included in every mental experience everyone has if we’re paying close attention. 

But my observation for many years is that there seems to be a movement towards and even a preference in the masses worldwide for the intuitive feeling type of experience. 

Why is that?

I think there are several reasons for this. 

First, I think it’s because it feels good. It’s an immediate response. There’s no lag time. Immediate gratification. No waiting. Feel good or feel bad. Black and white. Definitive. Clear. 

But does the primary reliance on living life based on whether something feels good (or not) create a balanced, productive life?

Drug addicts say it feels really good to be high. But did the knee jerk intuitive decision to shoot up lead to healthy consequences? Conspiracy theorists and their followers swear that there are bad things happening in the basement of a store that has no basement. But it feels good — almost tribal — to be part of that small group who “knows” there must be a “hidden basement.” Or that small group who “knows” that the Earth 🌎 is flat. But does belief in those conspiracy theories help create a more compassionate, less divisive, productive world?

What else is going on behind the scenes — within us — to make us lean towards trusting our gut feelings over our rational thought?

I think we are moved first by the visceral intuitive feelings we have. Then we assess them with our intellect, i.e., our rational thinking. I think that is the usual, normal, natural process.

But sometimes we skip that rational step. And just go with the intuition. 

If we’re honest, sometimes it works out for us and sometimes it doesn’t. Right? Our intuition is not right all the time. 

And more broadly — societally — why do we see so much emphasis on feelings in decision making? Why do we see a tendency for relying more on how something makes you feel?

Where does preference for intuitive (gut) feeling over rational thought come from?

“Emotion sells, intellect tells.” I learned that in life insurance sales training many years ago. 

Institutions — business, political, educational and governmental — all have learned that it’s easier (cheaper) and more effective (return on investment) to manipulate feelings than rational thinking. To get us to do what they want us to do. 

Car ads focus on “how they’ll make you feel” when you own the car. They create the illusion that your life will change for the better  — maybe get the adoration of all your friends (jealousy) — when you drive that car. So they can also appeal to your weaknesses emotionally — in this case perhaps your need to be worshipped by others. 

And what’s the simple formula?

“Just believe me (or my advertisement message) and blindly follow (buy the car).” And then your life will be…utopian. Perfect. Trouble-free. Blissful. 

And when your rational thought kicks in and you ask the salesperson sitting across from you: “But what about the monthly payments and the maintenance costs of this car?” — they’ll say some variation of the following:

“Ok, I know that what I said didn’t make total sense but, trust me, it will later…” (after you sign this purchase and sale agreement and buy the car). 

Sound familiar?

Whether it’s car sales, political elections, religious recruitment or college admissions — we’ve seen this play before. 

In all those industries what’s their objective?
Control. Control the narrative. Control your reaction. Control your decision making. 

My question to us all is this:

Does the overemphasis on intuitive feeling make society more vulnerable to those who want to control and manipulate us?

Food for thought. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 50 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“The 1960’s Love Culture & Teaching How to Draw Boundaries”

“The 1960’s Love Culture & Teaching How to Draw Boundaries”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

I grew up in the 1960s. We were raised by parents who grew up during or who even fought in World War II. 

There was a certain assumption made by most of our parents that you had to work for what you got in life — your studies, job, family…your happiness. And that meant figuring out how to live with boundaries, making choices, prioritizing. 

Things weren’t handed to you gift wrapped. They grew up not knowing if there was going to be a “tomorrow.”

That said, in the 1950-60s life was plentiful compared to wartime. No food shortages. No gas ⛽️ rationing. No working in factories to make bombs, planes, ships and ammunition just 10-20 years earlier. 

People could begin to relax and breathe. And enjoy life again. 

I think many of my generation got spoiled from that sudden post-war abundance. 

And then coupled with the anti-Vietnam War movement along with the “Peace and Love” culture, we became further distanced from the realities of what it took to accomplish things in life. 

I wonder sometimes if our children and (for some of us) grandchildren may have been raised with too few boundaries. I’m not arguing for strict disciplinarian parenting. 

However, I often see today’s parents dropping everything to accommodate their children’s needs and sometimes their whims. Meeting their “needs” I can see. Acquiescing to every “want” I see as problematic. 

And this often means the parents sublimating, even ignoring their own needs sometimes to accommodate “whatever my child wants.”

What message are we teaching our kids?

That we are not important and they are all-important? 

What lessons about “the gray areas of life” does that teach them? Or does that teach them that life is black and white?

Are we teaching them that all their hopes, dreams and desires — no matter what they are — will be met in life? And what happens when that doesn’t happen?

Have we set our kids and grandkids up for success or failure in life? Adaptability or rigidity? Happiness or disappointment?

Teaching our youth to manage boundaries is a very important life lesson and can mean the difference between inner peace and suffering. I think it’s something to pay attention to. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 50 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

A “Pious Devotee”?

A “Pious Devotee”?

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

How do we measure piety? What does “being pious” mean?

The Oxford dictionary definition says: “devoutly religious.” But interestingly, it also cites a secondary meaning: “making a hypocritical display of virtue.”

Whatever the religious tradition — Judeo, Christian, Islamic, Vedic, or any other of the thousands on Earth — there tend to be religious rituals and obligations expected to be fulfilled by their followers. They can range from not eating at all (fasting) to eating certain foods only (kosher), and wearing head coverings (yamaka, hijab) to shaving one’s head, and prayers or meditation at certain times of the day. 

I respect everyone’s religious beliefs. To me, that’s a very personal thing. A choice that each person makes within themselves. 

But I don’t judge a book by its cover. 

And yes, I do think it’s important “to judge.”

Not a person’s inner state. But as I discussed in my YouTube video on “Judging Others,” we should definitely judge other people’s behavior. Their actions. Because if we ignore their actions, we won’t learn anything about human behavior. And we’ll then be vulnerable to being abused by uncaring people. 

So with people who claim to be pious, what does this mean?

We need to observe their behavior. But not merely the superficial acts they perform. Because many charlatans are very skilled at doing the rituals — fasting on holy days, praying multiple times a day, wearing the appropriate head covering (as George Carlin famously pointed out, in some religions, men must cover their heads in temples but women must not, and in other religions, the opposite is required), however because these “religious performers” are only “acting the part,” they find it impossible to hide their true personality all the time and can’t help but “fall out of character” and abuse their wives, cats, dogs, children, co-workers, strangers (and everyone else under the sun) when they leave the temple, mosque or church. 

So, let’s assume God exists. Let’s not debate this because there is no real “scientific proof” either way. But for the sake of our discussion, if God exists, I think we would all agree that God must have “common sense.” (I can even hear our old friend George Carlin on the other side agreeing with that!)

So which one makes more sense, more “common sense”?

Whom do you admire more? Who seems to you to be living life more spiritually?

Is it the one who prays and fasts whenever his religion told him to and makes his children read scripture, but gets pleasure from making others feel miserable, berating his wife and acting emotionally cruel to his family? Or is it the one who forgets to pray and never fasts, but who is kind and compassionate to her family and community?

I’ll let you decide. You judge. Use your common sense. As I suspect God would do. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 50 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Are We Being Egotistical By Feeling Guilty That We Could Not Save A Friend?”

“Are We Being Egotistical By Feeling Guilty That We Could Not Save A Friend?”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Think about it. 

How many times have you heard (or perhaps felt yourself) someone say they “felt guilty” about not being able to convince a friend to save themselves?

Let’s unbundle that. 

First of all, is it good to care about the well-being of others, especially our friends?
Absolutely yes.
Of course. 

But that’s not the issue. Caring is not the issue. 

The issue is what can we do? What can we control? Especially what can we control when the friend does not want our help. That is the issue. 

Why? Because that is where: 1) we either stay free from guilt or 2) we strap pounds of guilt onto our shoulders — I would argue unnecessarily and inappropriately. 

What do I mean?

We can only help those who want to be helped. Those who at least implicitly — or explicitly — ask for our help. 

Otherwise we are “stepping on their Free Will toes” to choose something — a path — that we do not agree with. And do they have that power and ability to make a choice we do not agree with? Absolutely yes. 

Ask yourself:
Would you want them to be stepping on your ability to make your personal choices? Probably not. 

So why do you feel as if it’s your “right” or “responsibility” to step on their ability to choose?

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t say you believe in Free Will and personal choice ONLY when their choices AGREE with your choices! 

So, whenever you feel “guilty” about not having been able to change your friend’s choices that you think caused them suffering, you may actually be overstepping the bounds of that friendship. You may be trying to control someone else who has not even asked you for help. 

If so, you are actually acting quite egotistically — being self-centered. And not really acting in the best interests of your friend. But instead, in your own interest.

Which I would argue is not true friendship. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Where Does Belief In A Supreme Being Come From?”

“Where Does Belief In A Supreme Being Come From?”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert


Think about this question in whatever area of life that is easiest for you to ponder.  It does not have to be religion. How about business? Politics? Education? Law? Science? Heck, how about relationships and family?

I think this idea applies to any area of life. 

Now, first let’s clarify. I’m not suggesting that having a leader to organize a social unit in any of the above (or any other areas I didn’t mention) is unhelpful. Of course, from a purely “help the social unit function better” standpoint, having an organizational structure with managers and some reporting system is often useful. 

That’s not what I’m talking about here. 

I’m talking about belief in a being who is given absolute control over all decisions. With no possibility of input from any other entity. 

Where does the need for the desire and belief — and attempt to create such a person — arise from?

I think it comes from the belief that “control of others” helps us have a happier life. And that having a being who ultimately has “absolute control” over other people will definitely allow us — finally — to be happy. 

So we invent such a being. We do that through the structure of the area we are talking about. If it’s religion, we use our minds. If it’s politics, we may use an election. If it’s business or law, we may simply appoint the person.

But why? Why do we feel the need to put someone in that position of absolute control over everything and everyone?

I think it is because we feel “out of control.”

And because we feel out of control, we fear the future. We feel “uncertain” about what may happen to us next. 

And our solution is to invent someone who has absolute control over other people and things because we don’t have that control. 

But is control the real problem? Is that the true issue?

I think not. 

I think the real problem is that our desire to control arises from our insecurities. What do I mean? 

I think when we are feeling less confident about our own abilities to solve whatever life problems we may be facing — growing crops, disputes with neighbors, winning a sports game, or completing a business deal — we look outside ourselves for a “life preserver.” And depending on how much at a loss we are feeling — how desperate we are — determines how much control we give to that person. 

And we think that will solve our problem. Or problems.  

We think by successfully delegating all of our control to someone else, we will succeed all the time. And be happy. 

However, this assumes of course that the supreme being we have invented (or elected or appointed) always has our best interests in mind. 

Hmmmm. 

And so that would assume that supreme being has no self interest of their own. 

Food for thought. 

Sounds risky, right? Have you ever heard of anyone who does not have their own self to take care of? And wouldn’t it make sense that their taking care of themselves would be important to them?

Seems reasonable to me. We should all take care of ourselves first and foremost. Nothing wrong with that!

But what if that person’s self interest doesn’t always match up with ours? Starting to sound more risky, right?

So what’s the “least risky” route?

I think the best bet — where to put one’s money — is on ourselves first. 

Strengthening ourselves from within reduces the need for controlling other people and things outside of us. None of which we (or anyone else) can ever have absolute control over anyway. 

Because, even if we are seemingly successful in inventing a supreme being and giving them absolute control over us and everything else, we soon discover they actually don’t have the absolute control over everything we had hoped for. Or worse, we may discover to our dismay that they never really had our best interest in mind. And they only had their own selfish reasons for applying for the position of supreme being, and we may regret having deluded ourselves by thinking that a supreme being would save us.

So maybe inventing, electing or appointing a supreme being is not the answer to creating that permanent state of happiness we yearn for. Maybe the answer has always been that a supreme being has never needed to be invented. And that strengthening ourselves from within is all that has been needed to dissipate our fears and our perceived need for such absolute control.

That may be the more likely — and much less risky — route to a life of happiness. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Reverse Engineering Spirituality”

“Reverse Engineering Spirituality”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert


Life purpose? I’m often asked about this concept. 

“But Kel, look at what you’re doing, you’re helping so many people, (etc., etc.)…You have truly found your life purpose!”

First of all, who says that what qualifies as being called “life purpose” has to be directly helping others?

Second, what about everything else I’ve done in my life? Has that “not been my life purpose”???

I think many people look at others who are happy with what they’re doing and think, “See, THEY’VE found THEIR life purpose!”

As if happiness equates with life purpose. That only if you’ve found whatever the elusive “life purpose” is, then and ONLY THEN can you be happy. 

No. No. No. 
Did I say, “No”…???

That is a myth. 

And if you’re being really honest and candid with yourself, when you’re having those self doubts about whether you’re on the path to finding that final portal to “Shangri-La”…your life purpose…you’re usually feeling insecure, dissatisfied, unhappy…maybe even envious of others who seem happier than you. 

So, I think that often leads to “reverse engineering.”

We look at what we want. Happiness. And for us at that moment happiness appears to be what that other person has that we don’t. Work that makes them happy. 

And we conclude: they’ve found their life purpose!

Instead, maybe they’ve been trying out this and trying out that to see what makes them happiest. And they’ve “followed the bread crumbs” — the “do they meet and fulfill my desires” breadcrumbs — and after many such trial and errors, they’ve arrived at where you see them now. 

That’s the more likely scenario. 

Not the usual one taught in many spiritual workshops or YouTube videos where the teacher is guiding you through some exercise to “discover your life purpose.”

That type of workshop appeals to those who believe that there is some preordained “plan” that is somehow written in stone and that if we can only find the “magic key” like we’re in some real life “Indiana Jones” movie playing Harrison Ford, we’ll be happy. Finally. 

That approach assumes there is “an answer,” a state of Perfection, a final goal. And that approach, ironically, breeds continued unhappiness. Because there’s always “more”…and that guarantee of “always more” (whatever, fill in the blank) means “never satisfied.” Never happy. 

So I suggest we shift our priorities and our approach to seeking more contentment by looking more closely at our desires. And determine whether those life choices we have made align with and promote the fulfillment of those desires. 

I suggest we make THAT our “life purpose.” That process. Not some one-off job, that is subject to change when our desires shift. 

That process has helped me become more and more contented with what I’m doing with my life. Perhaps it might help you — and others you may come in contact with — in your eternal journey.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Fear — a Tough Reflection”

“Fear — a Tough Reflection”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert


Fear can be used as a means to self neglect. Albeit unconsciously. 

In particular, the fear of moving forward in a productive, healthy way.

When that happens, that can feed the phenomenon of “the Importance of Being Important.”

How?

By subconsciously causing self harm which inevitably invokes empathy, sympathy and even perhaps a public outcry — from one’s close friends, one’s loved ones…

And yes, even mere acquaintances, all shouting — “Save yourself!” “Please! We will miss you!”

All of which focuses enormous attention and energy on us — and suddenly, we feel important. 

We who have neglected taking care of ourselves.

So if we each are truly being candid with ourselves, and if our goal in life is genuinely focused on self development, we may need to take a long, hard look in the mirror and ask ourselves the tough question:

“Is my fear of moving forward 
actually a selfish way of drawing more attention
to myself
by creating a catastrophe through my own self neglect?”


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Is America in Denial About Its History?”

“Is America in Denial About Its History?”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert 

The current “issue du jour” is racial bias.

And I am not denying that America does have serious race relations issues — look, I have experienced them first-hand growing up in Boston.

But what about:

Anti-Catholic religious bias in politics until the 1960 election of JFK?

Anti-Semitic sentiment throughout the U.S. in the 1930s which was not outraged by how Germany was treating the Jews at the time.

Anti-Japanese and Asian sentiment in the U.S. — long before Pearl Harbor.

Anti-German sentiment in the U.S. — when Hitler rose to power in Europe.

The Puritans, Quakers and Baptists and how they treated each other when they came to the “colonies” in the 1600s.

The Irish and how they were abused when they came to the U.S. during the Potato Famine and afterwards.

The Italians and how they were abused when they immigrated to the U.S. shortly after the Irish influx.

The Polish and how they were abused when they immigrated to the U.S.

The Chinese working on the transcontinental Pacific Railroad, and how they were treated by white Americans — paid 30-50% less than the white workers plus had to buy their own food — and were considered less valuable than the black slaves in America who were seen as  having more “skills” for working in the fields, so the Chinese “coolies” were seen as expendable (10% mortality rate on the railroad from setting dynamite charges, etc.) and later sent to other high risk projects (dredging the Savannah harbor).

And yes, the fact that the original inhabitants of the “country of America” were factually (not a matter of opinion or interpretation) victims of systematic genocide started by the Pilgrims in the 1600s, then continued and coordinated on a much broader scale by nationwide governmental decree in the 1800s by sitting U.S. Presidents and members of Congress.

Ask yourself: 
Can you think of a racial, ethnic or religious immigrant group that has NOT been abused after coming to America? We have all been subject to such bullying. So, let’s stop making out like only our group has been bullied in our American history.

And what about some basic U.S. history of how important France and Prussia were in helping then General George Washington win the Revolutionary War against the British army? That the notion that he did it (or could have done it) on his own with his poorly funded, hardly trained rag-tag collection of “American” troops is a factual fallacy. A myth. Another baseless narrative creating the false belief in the “independent ability” of the U.S. to be able to “do everything on its own.”

That Abraham Lincoln was initially a supporter of sending the American slaves back to Africa to an area called Liberia. And he was not an abolitionist. Even though he considered it morally wrong, he did not believe in abolishing slavery, because it was sanctioned by the U.S. Constitution. And he did not believe black people should have the same rights as white people.

During the Civil War as a potential compromise with certain border states to avoid their secession and to buy him time to convince them to join the Union, Lincoln allowed slavery to exist in Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware to which the Emancipation Proclamation did not apply.

These are just a few historical “Facts about America” that most Americans are ignorant about.

I think that ignorance (or “denial” for those re-writers of history books who know but choose to forget) of these imperfections contributes to the myth that Americans are somehow superior to citizens of other nations. That Americans are somehow immune to the biases and resulting mistreatments of other human beings. 

I think this ignorance has sadly led to a “holier than thou” attitude among many Americans — I would say perhaps even among most Americans — that shuts down the American mind to change, to genuine growth. Perhaps more so even than citizens of other countries.

This is especially unfortunate because America is seen worldwide as the “ultimate experiment” in democracy. And if it isn’t working here, then what can be said about the experiments in other countries that are “learning from” observing America? So, in the end, this pressure to be perceived as the “example to the world” I think has created a systemic myth promoted not only by the government but also by its people, the citizens of America.

Note that I am not talking about “white” America. I am talking about all Americans — white, black, brown, and every other shade you want to pick. Because we have all bullied others at one time in our national and personal histories. If we are being candid and honest, we should all be able to admit that.

So, let’s stop blaming one group for this or that.

Because we have all been complicit in this “big lie” that America is some bastion of perfection and freedom. It simply is factually incorrect. Our history tells us so.

Politicians and committees who select which history books our children study in schools need to change their tune. Not to be ashamed of our mistakes, but to learn from them. To be proud of our accomplishments as a nation, but not arrogant. And to be more focused on what our historical reality has been, so we don’t keep repeating the same bad behavior towards others over and over for another 250 years.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Sports & Religion in the U.S.”

“Sports & Religion in the U.S.”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Many have commented on the decline of organized religion in the United States. It is a fact. Fewer people go to church or follow the religious beliefs of their childhoods or their grandparents. 

Some would say that decline has led to a society that is “rudderless” when it comes to moral values. That even though religions often motivated “kindness and good behavior” by invoking undesirable fear in their flocks (fear of punishment, fear of being shunned, etc.), at least there was some source of moral guidance in our American culture. 

I would say that erosion of religion — as a way that Americans identified with “who they are” (especially as a Catholic, Jew, Protestant, Muslim or other specific religious group) — started in the 1970s. 

People, I think, started to move away for two reasons. A realization that some of the basic underlying foundational beliefs did not make sense. And a nonacceptance of fear as a primary motivator. 

I think over the past 50 years a new “religion” has emerged in America.
Sports. 

I use the word “religion” loosely. But sports in the U.S., especially professional football, has taken on such a powerful grip on most Americans’ minds as to arguably be the significant influencing force on the masses. 

Whether you like it or not. I think that’s a fact. 

And with that powerful platform, speakers from the podium of the NFL have become examples of moral behavior. Good and bad. 

Again, whether you think that is appropriate or not. It has become a fact. 

Power tends to make that reality happen. And in America, power is associated with money. And no other multibillion dollar corporation in the U.S. has a more constant grip on millions of American minds and hearts than sports in general and the NFL in particular. 

Example: the Jon Gruden emails. 

Again, whether you think they should have been revealed to the public or not is irrelevant. The fact is they were. And they have stirred a great deal of conversation from “boardrooms to water coolers,” from “schools to kitchen tables.”

And yes. Within sports itself. Just yesterday the first NFL coach spoke up about it. A rarity in the NFL that in the past has often seen coaches be resoundingly silent on the off-field behavior of other coaches or former coaches. 

On Wednesday, Los Angeles Chargers coach Brandon Staley weighed in on his now ex-AFC West rival. He spoke candidly and at length on his thoughts. Watch the clip if you haven’t yet: https://youtu.be/ZxkVCHsxOAw

So, some of us may still be thinking, “Just shut up and play the game. I’m not here to hear your moral opinions on life. I’m here to watch the game and disengage.”

Like it or not, I think those days of putting our heads in the sand may be over. 

With the power and influence that sports and the NFL have gradually gained over the recent decades, they may have unintentionally graduated to become our new religion. And with that may have come a new level of expectation of their leaders, an expectation to be examples of kindness and respect for those they are leading. 

With the level of worship of money, “winning at all costs” (including sometimes misplaced ethical values (read: cheating)), and whitewashing of child abusers and wife-beaters who can run a 4.2 (second) 40 (yard dash), the NFL is still what some might call a place of “moral rot.”

But I pose this alternative view of sports as food for thought. And as hope for our cultural redemption. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“The Ineffectiveness of Running America on Emotional Economics”

“The Ineffectiveness of Running America on Emotional Economics”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Impossible Reality = Desire for top global wages for American workers + Cheapest products all manufactured in USA 

Flawed approaches:

Pay social welfare to poor sector with no incentive to work: Results in self-loathing by recipients and jealousy/disrespect by non-recipients. 

So the group is demeaned internally and externally. 

Creates an expectation from government to continue to support them, separates them further from other classes. 

Pay wealthy by giving tax benefits hoping that they will share the benefits with others: Results in reinforcing their self-interest, encouraging their worst elements of greed and self-importance. Creates an expectation from government to continue to support them, separates them further from other classes.

Pay corporations by giving tax benefits and subsidies hoping they will pass along to workers and/or innovate to create new or better jobs. Rarely ever happens. Ignores human behavior towards short-term personal self-interest. 

Creates an expectation from government to continue to support them, separates them further from public service sector, which they — ironically — want the support from. 

Solution:

Need to look at each group’s self-interest. Meet that interest in a way that also incentivizes them financially to work harder and smarter (more creativity/innovation/view of how helping others helps oneself). Remove institutional and structural (finance/tax) impediments from doing that. 

Otherwise:

Result = gradual stagnation of national creativity, slow decline in prosperity due to global economic weakness, further separation of social classes, increased strife and discontent, more tribalism and selfishness.

More “me.” Less “we.”


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“The Confusion Over Signs of Destiny”

The Confusion Over “Signs of Destiny”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

This essay was written in May 2018 at the Hanover Inn while I was at an Alumni Council weekend at Dartmouth College.

Have you ever experienced yourself, or maybe heard stories from friends, where something unusual  happened that may have been more than just the usual “coincidence”?

For example, this just happened to me. I seemingly randomly walked into the new student center at my college alma mater. When I was there in the 1970s, there was no such place for students to hang out. We either had our dorm rooms, or…outside (in the freezing cold, -30°F was common in the winter in Hanover, New Hampshire, so outdoor parties...not so much til Spring!!). I went right to the information desk and had a nice far-ranging conversation with the student working there. He of course told me the history of the student center, but we quickly got into personal stuff — my being on campus for the Alumni Council meetings, that I had just come from the building next-door where I had discovered to my pleasant surprise that the meditation center I founded in 1971 was still up on the third floor — although now decorated with fancy furniture, carpeting, dividing walls — a far cry from the Dean’s secretary Mrs. Johnson’s “sure, you can use the third floor but you’ll need to clear out the desks, chairs and other stuff that are stacked up and stored there.” We talked about his film production career after graduation, his playing offensive tackle for the football team, and my nonprofit work. He even suggested an on-campus organization that I should contact to help student-athletes with my meditation work.

An hour later I asked him his name. 

His name has significant meaning for me. I thought, “wow, that’s interesting.” Not a usual name, and one that has a lot of meaning for me personally.

“Marcus.”

Many of us have had similar experiences. That very strange, highly unusual, seemingly random event or chance meeting that otherwise seems inexplicable.

So, we often hear people say, “It was meant to be. It was destiny that it happened. It had to happen.”

Was that a “sign” or evidence that there is something called Destiny?

No, I don’t think so.

And yet I actually think there is a good explanation for why these things happen. As well as a good explanation for why many people think these are signs of some sort of predestination.

Essentially you could distill it down to these two points: 1) yes, there may be communications coming to us from the Other Side, but 2) that does not mean that replaces or usurps Free Will.

Let’s try to unbundle that common conflation in the world — that these sort of “unexplained coincidences” are evidence of destiny or determinism.

First, let’s agree on one thing. That we are all minds or consciousnesses — some people like to use the word souls. I tend to use the word “minds” because it is not religiously or culturally charged. It’s more neutral. Feel free to use a synonym if you like. 

And my experience is that our minds are eternal, or at least they last for a very, very long time based on memories that I have had. I’ve written about this idea of eternity in other blogs and essays.

So that means that our minds can and do exist after the physical death of the body.

My experience also supports the notion that personal choice exists. That Free Will is always operating. Each of us can always choose to make different choices in life, that no one has absolute control over us with “puppet strings,” or maybe even a better image — no one has us chained and enslaved.

Yet, the fact that minds “on the other side of the veil” may sometimes communicate with us on this side can often muddy the waters causing some people to use it as evidence of destiny. The idea that “whisperings from the other side” to minds on this side may create appearances of predestination. 

Instead, I think they are just more examples of things happening caused by the desires and intentions of various minds. 

For example, maybe one of my friends on the Other Side whispers to me as I’m walking across the campus to go explore the old meditation room on the third floor of Robinson Hall, which may also happen to coincide with a desire that I had already had myself. But the whispering simply prods me, pushes me in that direction that I was already leaning in this case. 

Think of it this way. It’s no different from a friend who is in physical form walking alongside of you who says, “let’s go check that old room out.” To me, it’s the same thing. Whether you can see the person or not. Doesn’t matter.

But then it’s still up to me to choose to go or not go. Which is why it does not happen every time, because our Free Will is operating all the time

But, when the mind is more aware, the various desires and intentions are more likely to manifest. It’s all probabilities. Nothing is guaranteed. (Guarantee is implied in the concept of “Destiny.”) But the level of self-awareness of the minds involved definitely comes into play.

So, maybe somebody did whisper to that student working at the information desk, or whispered to a number of people to increase the likelihood that he would be working at the desk on the day I walked in. Who knows?

But, while the confluence of situations and events that led up to my meeting him may seem unusual from a certain perspective, it does not mean that there was a guaranteed meeting — a Destiny.

Why is this important?

Because I think a belief in Destiny is a source of suffering for many people — whether they realize it or not. It can cause people to “hold back,” to be passive in life. Hesitant. Always waiting for some “sign.” And when it doesn’t come, or if it seems to come, and doesn’t work out as expected — despair.

“Why have I been forsaken?”
“What did I do wrong?”
“What did I do to deserve this?”

Instead of taking action and assertively making choices based on the data at hand. And in the long-run, they tend to not learn from their lives on Earth — repeating the same old patterns often based on ancient cognitively inconsistent beliefs — and continue for lifetimes suffering in ways that might be overcome by continued conscious explorations and knowingly making a wider variety of more effective choices over those lifetimes. Without fear of experimenting in those many previous lives through those choices.

That is my reason for sharing these thoughts.

To perhaps, if they resonate, help us see life from different perspectives, different seats in the theater of life, so that we might perceive our long-held ideas and beliefs in a different light. Maybe a light that may bring more clarity to our life’s choices. And thus, less suffering and more happiness.

More contentment as we each travel in our respective journeys through the universe.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“Guilty Pleasures”

“Guilty Pleasures”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

Where does this idea come from? Is it good for us to have?

See my essay on “Sex & Spirituality” in my 2021 book Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life. I won’t repeat that essay here, except to say that the origin I think of this notion of “guilty pleasures” came from a bunch of celibate monks 8-10,000 years ago who honestly thought it was good advice.

Food for thought. 

But OK, let’s back up a bit and let’s focus on the “guilty” part. And expand the discussion here beyond just sex.

What is a “guilty pleasure” in our modern day society?

The dictionary definition is “something, such as a movie, TV program, or piece of music, that one enjoys despite feeling that it is not generally held in high regard.”

So, it is something embarrassing to admit to enjoying — like watching reality TV shows, preferring comic books over reading “The Economist” magazine, or eating potato chips as your “vegetable” for your evening meal.

But I want to expand our thinking about “guilty pleasures” from merely the 21st century slang that we may be familiar with. Because I think in that slang phrase lies a deeper, more troubling seed that has grown over the millennia without our knowing or paying attention to.

I think this idea of “guilty pleasures” arises from a “should” place. A “Thou shalt” — or an equally commanding “Thou shalt not” — place. 

“You shouldn’t eat that piece of dark chocolate cake…”

And why “should we not”? Why should we not experience the pleasures of life? Whether they be from chocolate cake, comic books or sex.

I think it may actually originate from the idea that this earthly life is not the important one — we are only here temporarily to get to the Afterlife where we will live for eternity. That will be the place of “pleasure.” So, we should forsake all pleasures while we are living on Earth. We really should not be having fun while here on Earth. Thus, the term “guilty pleasures.”

Also, there is this other element built into the idea of “guilty pleasures.”
The thrill. 

Hold back, hold back, hold back….OK, now let go!

The thrill of the taste of dark chocolate in one’s mouth, the thrill of touching the smoothness of skin in a religiously forbidden area of the body, the thrill of Mardi Gras before Lent starts.

We have a fundamental problem as humans. We are generally fairly numb to experience. Our mental, emotional and physical sensory antennas are dull and poorly calibrated — lacking sharpness and alertness. So we need the roller coaster ride. The fireworks. The thrill to “wake us up” out of our slumber. Our dull state of zombie sleepwalking.

But why is this so? What has caused us to be a population of so many sleepwalkers?

A combination. 

Partially belief based as we have pointed out. But also partially experienced based. We have so little familiarity with the vastness and creativity, and inner power of our mind — our individual consciousness — that we feel very insecure. And are generally inept at accessing the incredible capabilities of our own minds. But since I’ve written elsewhere extensively about how we can expand our capacity (see my book referenced above), I want to stay focused here on this different “approach” to thinking about pleasure. 

Instead…

How about this?

Lean into the pleasure. 

Don’t hold back. Instead, move in the direction of the pleasure. That’s what I mean by “lean into it.” Don’t pull away from it — move towards it.

Savor the dark chocolate cake. Let each morsel be caressed by your tongue and appreciated by your taste buds. Don’t eat it looking over your shoulder to see who is watching you. Judging you. 

Lean into the pleasure.

OK, sure — teasing a little is fine. Playful. But stay clear of the guilt-ridden act of holding back.

And note: Those of you who have read my essays on “selfishness” know that I am not suggesting a culture of hedonism at any cost. An irresponsible pursuit of all pleasures. No. 

But withholding ourselves from enjoying the pleasures of life has created a world 🌎 of suffering. 

I have spoken with many people who have felt guilty about taking care of themselves, of enjoying anything for themselves personally in their lives. Some have said all they find pleasure in is “helping others” at the temple, the food bank, etc. But they then feel guilty whenever they take a moment for themselves so they keep busy all the time to distract themselves from thinking about their needs and desires. 

What a waste of human lifeforce. How sad.

I think far too many well-meaning people live like that. Essentially unhappy their entire lives. But appearing to the outside world as “a Good Samaritan who sacrificed all for the good of others.” A “Mother Theresa.” How many times have you heard that? How many times have you praised someone for that extreme degree of selflessness?

Are you helping or hurting them?

Let’s think about this further.

Why are people cruel in our world 🌎? As I’ve written about, I think because at their core they’re unhappy, insecure people. And to make themselves happier they then need to make others around them unhappy. So the cruel person then feels better! Happier. Accomplished through their cruel behavior. Sometimes consciously. But usually this is unconscious. 

So could we actually be contributing to the cruelty in the world by our not exploring what would give us each personal pleasure? Not that we are acting cruelly towards others intentionally. But are we adding to the unhappiness in the world nevertheless by tacitly demonstrating our belief that “personal pleasure is bad”? 

And by this, are we perhaps creating a greater likelihood of falling prey to the occasional outlet of very unhappy people — treating others badly, cruelly? All subconsciously of course.

Food for thought.

Don’t make “guilt” an integral part of your “seeking of pleasure” in life. 

Why are we here?
Why did we choose to be here in physical biological bodies on Earth?

To enjoy life. All of it. All the parts of it. That’s my opinion. Hopefully without hurting others in the process.

So let’s live it fully — and that means without guilt. Without holding back from the pleasures of life. 

No more “guilty pleasures.” 

Lean into the pleasure.


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“A Huge Source of Suffering”

“A Huge Source of Suffering”

Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert & Meditation Teacher


Being an “over-helper”!

Usurps the other person’s sense of control and Free Will.
Trains the person to be enslaved. 

That “unasked for help” immediately feels like a violation to those who are more self-confident. And to those who are less confident about their ability to manage life it feels good — temporarily. Then it eventually feels patronizing and the person develops resentment towards the unasked for help. 

We can see that with raising our children, in our friendships, in our marriages, in our attempts at social welfare, and in our foreign affairs globally. 

And furthermore, for those who have taken my Afterlife series classes…

That’s why the “30th November” message was shared in 2014. 

It was a marker in the spiritual history of humankind to make clear that key spiritual leaders involved in the world 🌎 for the past 10,000 years had decided that they too recognized that “over helping” causes suffering. 

That by demanding obedience from their followers, they inadvertently caused those devout followers to be more susceptible to being bullied by others — others who didn’t have the kind motives that these spiritual leaders had. 

In effect, by demanding spiritual obedience, these leaders had unwittingly trained their followers to become more compliant, more passive. And — unfortunately — more vulnerable to being taken advantage of by selfish and narcissistic people in the world. 

Ironically, the more devout the follower, the more obedient they were — yet the more vulnerable they became to mistreatment by others. 

In addition, this approach squelched the followers’ ability to exercise their Free Will. And the long-term impact of that — becoming increasingly less effective at making good life choices — has caused tremendous conflict and suffering in billions of people worldwide over the millennia. 

So, for all those reasons, as was stated in the 30th November messages, it was decided that no longer would any of them continue to demand unwavering obedience or subservience for any reason, spiritual or otherwise. And instead, they’re encouraging us to see them all as our friends. Not our gurus, divine masters or gods. 

More parity. Less hierarchy. 

An encouragement to begin to view life more as an eternal democracy. 

And I would add that since they have laid down the marker about this in 2014 to all of us here on Earth, these spiritual leaders have turned much of their attention towards educating and spreading these messages among all those on the Other Side. And we’ve been told that it’s an even more challenging task there, given the engrained beliefs in the value of hierarchies. 


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.

“The Power of Love”

“The Power of Love”

by Kelvin Chin
Life After Life Expert

I teach people how to overcome their fears. About death. And about uncertainty. 

Along with overcoming those fears comes greater self-acceptance. More love. Love for oneself. 

Jesus taught that “love” means “accepting the other person for who they are, not who you wish they were, or think they should be.” But can we apply that same principle to ourselves? I think so. 

Accepting ourselves for who we each are — including all our quirks and imperfections. Not who we wish we were. I think we each can apply that individually. Each in our own unique personal ways. 

That is actual self-acceptance. True self-love. 

As you may also know, I work in the field of Afterlife education as well. I often hear stories of people who have had NDEs, “near-death experiences.” And a common theme in their recounting of their experiences is that they feel “more love than they’ve ever felt before.”

I have sometimes wondered how much that intense perceived degree of love, i.e., acceptance, is directly related to the lack of love they have felt from others — their parents, spouses, friends — before their NDE. Or even lack of self-acceptance within themselves. 

So I thought about the “power of love” in the context of NDEs. 

What if one was so loved and accepted — most importantly by one’s own self — before one had the NDE? Could we imagine what that experience of the Afterlife might be like then?

Perhaps it would be less shocking. Due to less contrast.

Coming already from a “place” or a state of being of profound self-acceptance perhaps the transition would simply be a smooth and easy one. Without the gasps and the wows that often accompany such typically high contrast experiences. 

And what would that have meant if that were to hypothetically take place?

It would have meant that that person had “turned within” consistently and over a long enough period to become so comfortable with herself that she was pretty much in a state of self-acceptances, or love, most of the time. 

And what would that give rise to?

A very happy life. A fulfilled life. Now. Here on Earth 🌎. Long before transitioning to the Other Side. 

So why wait? Why not start now?


Kelvin H. Chin is a Meditation Teacher, Life After Life Expert, and Author of “Overcoming the Fear of Death,” “Marcus Aurelius Updated: 21st Century Meditations On Living Life” and “After the Afterlife: Memories of My Past Lives.” He learned to meditate at age 19, and has been teaching Turning Within Meditation and coaching others in their self-growth for 40 years. He helps people understand their life challenges through their individual belief systems, and helps them find their own solutions. His past life memories reach back many centuries, and he accesses those memories in his teaching and his coaching in the same way all coaches draw on their own available experiences for perspective and effective analogies. He can be reached at www.TurningWithin.org.